Got Questions? Get Answers... MD Is Concerned About Her Family's Future And Is Considering Strategic Default

Got Questions?

To Whom it May Concern;

I came across the term 'strategic default' recently while researching the idea of letting my home go into foreclosure. I am not a homeowner struggling to pay my bills, I have excellent credit and not very much credit card debt.  I was looking for a way to avoid bankruptcy if possible.

I purchased my home about 7 years ago.  I was a single mom of 2 young boys and my tiny, 2 bedroom ranch made perfect sense for us at the time.  I planned on making improvements over the years and being able to some day sell my home and make a profit.  However, we are now desperate for a bigger home and unfortunately owe more than I could sell it for.  I have talked to representatives with HARP who say that because I have no trouble paying my mortgage that they can't help me. I have talked to my mortgage servicer and they can't help me either.  I would not qualify for a short sale, deed in leiu or even to refinance.

I struggle with this idea feeling that staying here and paying my mortgage every month is the morally right thing to do but this home no longer suits our needs as a family and is in need of repairs that I simply cannot afford. I met with a "real estate" attorney thinking he could help guide me.  He had never heard of strategic default or the mortgage debt relief act.  He was unable to tell me anything.  He said I was asking a lot of what if type questions he couldn't answer.  He told me because I pay my bills I should simply keep doing that.

I came across your website and it said you offer consultation on such a process and to email you.  So, I would appreciate any information you could provide to help guide me in the path that is right for my family and I.

Thanks for your time.

Sincerely,
MD

Get Answers...

Got Questions? Get Answers... JSW is Concerned About His Future Finances So He Can Protect His Family

Got Questions?

Hi, I bought my current home in August, 2001. I have made each and every payment on-time the entire time I have owned the home. I have exceptional credit (850 FICO). I have tried to sell the home 3 times. At present, it is listed for sale. I have it listed $7,000 below what I owe on the mortgage and I have no takers. Sadly, it backs to a busy road and has a small backyard. However, it is well taken care of -- almost new -- and considerably upgraded. I just can't seem to sell it. I don't even think I could get someone to buy it even at $200K. And now, it looks like Romney is going to win the election and repeal the mortgage interest deduction. I currently take $35,000 in deductions just in mortgage interest alone. Even with his so-called cuts, it will be a huge tax increase for me. I can't afford it. I'm already supporting my parents and my brother who is currently out of work.

I would like to strategically default on the property, but I don't know if that is the best option. What would be your advice? I think I am too far off the mark for a short sale since I don't think it would sell even at $200K. It is sad because the home is in a very nice affluent community where the average incomes are over $100,000 annually. And, I don't think the bank is going to work with me at all in taking back a property that is clearly worth much less than I owe on it. I feel I got the short end of the stick and that it isn't going to get any better unless I do something. Even trying to sell it at a loss, I'd be clearing my 401K to do so and no one will step up and buy it.

What do you think? Is strategic default the right option for me?

Kind regards,

JSW

 
Get Answers...

Got Questions? Get Answers...PA Seeks Direction In Order to Reduce His Anxiety

Got Questions?

[I] have read alot about it. I don't think i would qualify for a short sale as i have income, but bank only wants to lower interest for five years on a loan that is $100k underwater. I hate the abandoned neighborhood and the house is falling apart even though it was built in 2003. AZ is a non-recourse state.

I am current on 1st mortgage there is no second. I need to find somewhere to live.

1.) WHEN SHOULD I TRY AND RENT A NEW HOME?

2.) How long does "freddie Mac" (serviced by wells fargo) take to evict you once payments are stopped?

3.) should i occupy the home until evicted?

I am nervous, worried and frankly afraid. I am a disabled single dad with NO-ONE to help me. I am confused in spite of my reading about what to expect. Please respond as I am fairly desperate. I don't know if I have asked all the right questions or considered all of the possibilities yet. PLEASE HELP!

Sincerely, PA


Get Answers…

Got Questions? Get Answers...MRA Wants A Strategic Default Plan

Got Questions?

Hi. My husband and I are thinking about walking away from our home. We live in Illinois and purchased our home in 2005 for $157,000. In December of 2006 we got a 2nd mortgage HELOC of $18,000. Maxed that on credit card debt and medical bills. In January of 2010 I lost 10% of my pay because of the recession and my husband would work over time all year up until then too. So we lost all that money as well. We were very dependent of his OT. We fell behind on our 1st mortgage. The most was 3 months behind. Finally in November 2010 we got approved and accepted a loan modification on our 1st mortgage with BOA and our principal balance was lowered to $145,000 and the payments we were behind were forgiven. I never notified my 2nd bank HELOC or ever fell behind on payments with the 2nd loan. I am only paying the minimum interest payments. My 2nd loan is with my Credit Union that I have banked with for 20+ years (dont know if that matters). Oh and the loan they gave me as the HELOC, would need to be paid back by end of 10 years. Well that isn’t going to happen. So now I have fallen 1 month behind on my 1st mortgage with BOA. Still paying my 2nd on time. Have looked on zillow.com to see that my home is currently worth on their website $91,700. It needs a ton of work not to mention. Needs a new kitchen as I think its the original kitchen from when the house was built in 1960. The bathroom is full of mold and the basement is 1/2 finished. And also, my husband and I have maxed out our credit cards AGAIN which is about $10,000 total. I need a new car as the one I have has 198k miles and my husband and I just purchased a used one last year that we still owe $5k on. We are thinking of just buying a new car for me and then just walking away. We don’t think it’s worth paying for something that is worth almost 1/2 of what we owe on it and not to mention the additional money it needs to fix it up. I'd like to actually pay off my credit cards when I walk away, but don’t know if just filing for bankruptcy for everything EXCEPT the cars would be best.

Can you help me? I so look forward to your advice.

MRA


Get Answers…

Debt Defense 101: The Must Know Rules Of Debt Defense

The basic rules of Deficiency Debt Defense 101 are an ever growing list of MUST DO and MUST IMPLEMENT RIGHT NOW basic strategies in order to achieve the goal of deficiency debt defense.

Deficiency debt also known as debt deficiency arises when collateral that is used to secure a loan cannot satisfy the total amount due on the loan. It happens most often with debt involving real estate. However, it can occur in other types of collateralized loans such as car, business, and equipment loans. When a loan goes unpaid, the lender has the right to auction off the property to pay off the debt. If the lender collects less than what is owed at the sale, the shortage is called debt deficiency. A lender can turn a debt deficiency into a deficiency judgment. Please read What Everyone Should Know About Debt Forgiveness, Obligations and Deficiencies to learn more about debt deficiency and the consequences of a deficiency judgment.

The primary goals of deficiency debt defenses are to:

1. Reduce the Risk and Amount of Deficiency Debt.
2. Strengthen Your Defenses Against Deficiency Debt.
3. Lengthen The Time To Pay Back The Deficiency Debt.

A proper defense requires that you plan and prepare now. So make sure to implement all of these rules. Make sure you come back and read these rules every month. We will be adding new rules along the way. Also, each rule will be further detailed and expanded in future blog posts. We will do our best to apply each rule to a real life scenario.

In the meantime start reading and start preparing.

1. Do not ignore any legal papers. Always prepare a defense to every legal action. Always respond to a legal action in writing. It LENGTHENS the time and STRENGTHENS your defense 100% of the time.

2. Try to save every debt collection message with a live voice on your answering machine. Save messages that appear to be aggressive, intimidating, or threatening.  It may be useful if you need to prove a creditors improper tactics. Make sure you keep track of calls about your debts to other people or businesses.  There are creditors who may contact family, friends, or business associates. This must be stopped. You can use a cease and desist letter to try and put a stop to phone call communications. 

Collection Tactics Monitor: October 9, 2010

In our previous Collection Tactics Monitor: October 6, 2010 post, we talked about a debt collection technique employed by a company called Heritage Pacific Financial. Please read the prior post so you can put this post into context. Since that post, we received the following email:

"Hello, I am writing you on your article http://www.debtdefense101.com/2010/10/collection-tactics-monitor-october-6.html. I am pretty much in the same case than “Kim” except Heritage Pacific took it a step further and filed suit against me. More or less the same Boiler Plate FRAUD complaint. I’m in process of hiring an attorney to respond to this and ask the court to dismiss this case (plus their Statute of Limitation is expired). I wonder if the hundred of people being victimized by this company http://hpdebtexchange.com/ couldn’t unite and counter-sue or get them close down business…Best, PK"

So assuming that PK's email is true then Heritage Pacific believes one or all of the following:

Got Questions? Get Answers...BSE Wants To Walk Away From Two Investment Properties in Vegas

GOT QUESTION?

This question has to do with two properties I own in Las Vegas. Briefly , they are two townhomes in the same develpoment w/ mortgages by two different lenders. Both are intrest only ARM's due to adjust in 2012 and 2013. I've owned them since 2005 and they are currently worth 50% of what I paid. Principe balance on one is $204,000.00 and $172,000.00 on the other. I'm current on both and they are rented but with neg. cash flow. I sold my buisness in 2004 and all of the note payments from the sale of my buisness has gone into these two properties. When these mortgages adjust I most definately will not be able to afford them. My wife and I are both on the notes, she is currently employed and I work part time on a cash basis. We also own our home her in New York as well as a commercial property. The lenders won't talk to me until I miss at least three payments, I'm condisering walking away. What are the potential consequences? By the way I put down $50,000.00 on each of these properties.

Thanks for your help!

BSE

GET ANSWER…

Dear BSE:

Thank you for writing.

First of all, you and your wife are equally liable and equally responsible for the mortgage loan since you both signed the note. A lender or creditor will not differentiate between who signed the note first or last, as long as it has been signed by each party.

The primary risks of a strategic default are:

1. Deficiency debt leading to a deficiency judgment.
2. Lower credit score.
3. Loss of the home or property to a foreclosure sale.
4. Recently, Fannie Mae implemented a rule that bans a person from
obtaining a Fannie Mae mortgage, if that person strategically defaults. The ban last for seven years. Furthermore, the United States Government may pass a law that bans a person from obtaining a government insured loan, if it is proven that a person strategically defaults. Read this link to learn more.
5. Debt collections tactics, including mail, letters, personal visits to the
property, phone calls to cell phone, work, and/or family members. Not all debt collection tactics are legal. You should become familiar with your state’s debt collection protection laws and the Fair Debt Collections Protections Act. Read this link to learn more.

My experience has established that most people who strategically default are most concerned about deficiency debt. Most people do not want to be chased down for more money by creditors or lenders.

Let’s go through deficiency debt issues carefully. A deficiency debt also known as debt deficiency arises when collateral that is used to secure a loan cannot satisfy the total amount due on the loan. The unsatisfied amount due on the loan is a deficiency debt.

A deficiency judgment is an unsecured money judgment against a borrower whose mortgage foreclosure sale did not produce sufficient funds to pay the underlying promissory note or mortgage loan, in full. A deficiency judgment can be obtained when there is a deficiency debt.

You mentioned that your properties are in Las Vegas, Nevada. Nevada is a recourse state. That means a lender has the right to seek a deficiency judgment. A lender must file for a deficiency judgment in a certain period of time after a foreclosure sale. Please read this link to learn more.

If a lender or creditor forgives the deficiency then you will not be exposed to a deficiency judgment. When a lender or creditor agrees (IN WRITING) to forgive a debt as opposed to seeking a deficiency judgment, then the forgiven debt may be considered income by your state taxing authority and the IRS. Forgiven debt is income.

Under current Federal Law if a debt is forgiven on a primary residence then there is no tax due to the IRS. However, your properties are investment properties so it is unlikely you can benefit from the rule.

There are ways to minimize your risks of a deficiency judgment:

You can negotiate a principle reduction. This is when a lender or creditor agrees to reduce the principle balance of a loan. You can ask the lender to forgive the difference (IN WRITING) as part of the negotiation.

You can negotiate a deed-in-lieu. This is when you enter into a written agreement to give the property back to the bank. The key is to negotiate a full settlement of your total outstanding mortgage debt including fees and penalties in exchange for the deed to your property. A full settlement of your total outstanding mortgage debt eliminates a deficiency and tax liabilities. A partial settlement still leaves open the possibility of a deficiency judgment or forgiveness of the remaining balance.

You can negotiate a short sale. This is when a lender let’s you sell your property for an amount less than what is owed on the mortgage. Essentially your lender may be willing to accept less than the full amount due on a mortgage. If you owe the lender $400,000 then the lender may agree to let you sell the property for $350,000.

In all these cases you must get the lender to agree to forgive the deficiency.

Beware of the Turn In Your Financial Documents Trap. This happens when the lender’s representative asks you to turn in your financials via telephone or fax in order to see if you qualify for a loan workout, principle reduction, deed-in-lieu, or short sale. Before you agree to turn over your financial documents ask the lender to send you something in writing stating that they will seriously consider a work out option if you turn over your financials. Or ask the lender to direct you to their website regarding their loan workout processing rules. The problem I have is this: What happens to your financial documents, if your lender refuses to negotiate a loan workout? Can the lender use this information against you? For example, can the lender use the information during a foreclosure action or during a lawsuit seeking a deficiency judgment? In order to collect on a properly obtained deficiency judgment, the creditor or lender must locate your bank account, or locate your investment account or locate your place of employment or locate any other asset that has value. I don’t think anyone wants to turn over their financial documents to be used in any way to take their money.

If you do decide to turn over financial documents to the creditor or lender, then cross out all of the account numbers. If the creditor or lender refuses to work with you after you have turned over your financial documents then immediately move all of your money and your investments to another financial institution. Only turn over what the lender asks for nothing more.

A creditor or a lender has the right to garnish wages if it properly and legally obtains a deficiency judgment in a court of law against a person who entered into a legal loan agreement with the creditor or lender. Your wife could be exposed to wage garnishment if the creditor or lender successfully obtains a deficiency judgment against her.

Keep in mind that even if a creditor or lender successfully obtains a deficiency judgment, it does not mean all is lost. You can negotiate a settlement with the creditor or lender. The creditor or lender may take 50% or less than what is owed instead of spending time in court. Also keep in mind to NEVER LET A LAWSUIT FOR A DEFICIENCY JUDGMENT GO UNDEFENDED. NEVER IGNORE THIS TYPE OF LAWSUIT. The simple reason is that you may stop the creditor or lender from getting a judgment or you may be able to use your defense to this lawsuit as a means to negotiate a settlement.

A critical decision is how to protect your assets. There are various tools and strategies that can be employed to legally protect or hide your assets from a creditor. Keep in mind there is a rule called fraudulent conveyance. Essentially, a fraudulent conveyance is when a debtor transfers their assets in a way to prevent a creditor from collecting on a debt. There are specific rules regarding fraudulent conveyance, so this should not prevent you from properly protecting your assets.

Unfortunately, you will lose your initial $50,000 investment. However, you should speak to an accountant to determine what happened to your cash investment if the property is sold at a loss.

You should seriously consider working with a qualified real estate broker, attorney and/or accountant in order to understand your specific risks.

You have much to consider. I am confident you are on the right track.

Please feel free to write me at anytime.

Sincerely,

Augustine A. Diji

Got Questions? Get Answers...KL Wants To Strategically Default In Colorado - Can The Bank Come After Him?

GOT QUESTIONS?

Hi,

I am considering strategic default and am wondering how Colorado state law will effect strategic default within CO. Can the bank come after the debtor for the balance?
Thanks,

KL

GET ANSWERS…

KL

Thanks for writing.

You are essentially asking is Colorado is a recourse or non-recourse state. It is my understanding that Colorado is a recourse state therefore a lender may have the right to collect on the unpaid mortgage balance after your property is sold.

Read the following link to learn about debt deficiency, forgiveness, and obligations and the link on recourse and non-recourse states.

I advise you to speak with a legal professional that is familiar with Colorado’s foreclosure laws, debt laws, deficiency laws, recourse laws, and collection laws.

Thank you.

Augustine A. Diji

What is the Difference Between Non-Recourse & Recourse States?

State laws regulate the actions that creditors can take when trying to collect on a secured loan. In some cases, states prohibit the creditor from seeking more than the collateral used to secure the loan. This is called “non-recourse” or “anti-deficiency,” meaning that a creditor cannot hold the borrower personally liable for more than the value of the proprety at the time of sale. Generally, in a non-recourse state, if a lender cannot recoup its loan from the sale or seizure of the asset used for collateral, then the relevant state law will limit the lender’s ability to collect from the borrower.

In a non-recourse state, if you default on your home loan, the bank can only foreclose on the home. If the sale proceeds are not enough to repay the loan, the bank cannot take further action or the bank is limited on what it can collect. For example, in a non-recourse jurisdiction such as California, if a borrower owes a lender a $100,000 deficiency after the completion of a short sale or a foreclosure sale, under most circumstances the lender cannot get the money from the borrower. Each state implements “non-recourse” or “anti-deficiency” laws differently.

As of this writing, the following states have some form of non-recourse or anti-deficiency law:

Alaska, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Iowa, North Carolina, North Dakota, Minnesota, Montana, Oregon, and Washington

.

There are also “one-action” states, which means that lenders are only permitted a single legal action to collect mortgage debt. Individual state laws vary. In New York, for example, a lender must choose between the actions of suing to collect the debt or foreclosing on the property. The following states have some type of one-action statute:

California, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New York, and Utah.

In a recourse jurisdiction such as Ohio, if a borrower owes a lender a $100,000 deficiency after a short sale or a foreclosure sale, the lender can chase the borrower for the difference, i.e., get a personal judgment against a borrower. However, most recourse states have very strict rules governing the process of obtaining deficiency judgments. If a lender does not follow the rules in a recourse state, then it may not be able to obtain a deficiency judgment. For example, under New York State law, a lender must file for a deficiency judgment within 90 days after the foreclosure sale of the property.

As of this writing, these are the recourse states:

Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, District of Columbia (D.C.), Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Idaho, Indiana,  Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Ohio, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.  

State laws vary. If you are considering a strategic default, consult your state law regarding the creditor’s rights to collect.